Another Imbecile Gets Herself Arrested for Posting Her Dog Abuse on Facebook

8.30.16 - Moron Posts Dog Abuse on Facebook1

Some people feel compelled to post absolutely everything about their lives on social media, and thankfully some people are so foolish that they get themselves in trouble because of their posting addictions.  That’s what happened when Sarah Beth Boothby shared a picture of her dog on Facebook, showing it with shoelaces tied around its muzzle.  People quickly reported her and she was charged for her crime.

The Shiloh Police Department was bombarded with messages from concerned Facebookers who came across the photo Boothby posted of her dog that was accompanied with the caption, “When you chew up mommy’s shoelaces…”

They responded and charged the woman with misdemeanor animal cruelty because the shoelaces were tied “in a manner that appeared that it could restrict the dog’s air flow.”

She claims that her dog’s snout was only bound for about 45 seconds, but the fact that she would do it at all is highly disturbing.  Dogs often chew things that they’re not supposed to, but that’s why it’s important for owners to train them well and to give them things they are allowed to chew.  Positive reinforcement is far more effective than positive punishment.*

Sadly, because the dog was otherwise in good health and appeared to be well cared for, the police were unable to do nothing more for it.

It’s clear that Boothby thought she was teaching her dog a lesson, but hopefully it’s she who will learn something here:  don’t be an abusive jerk, and don’t post your crimes on Facebook.

8.30.16 - Moron Posts Dog Abuse on Facebook2

The term “negative reinforcement” is a misnomer, and what people often mean by it is punishment.  Negative reinforcement means subtracting something to reinforce a behavior (i.e. hitting snooze on the alarm – when the noise is taken away, a person will repeat the behavior of shutting the alarm off).  Positive reinforcement is adding something to reinforce a behavior (i.e. giving a dog a treat for learning a trick).

Positive punishment is the addition of something to curb a behavior (i.e. striking a dog – adding pain – to stop it from barking).  Negative punishment is the removal of something to stop a behavior (i.e. taking away a video game because a child misbehaved).

Incidentally, punishment only works on the conditions that it is immediate, severe, and contingent upon the behavior for which one is being punished.  (No, I am not suggesting that animals be punished severely for misdeeds – positive reinforcement is the best method of teaching.) While in this case it was severe, if it took place even more than a few minutes after the dog chewed on the laces, punishment would do no good because the dog wouldn’t know what it was being punished for.  It might have done 10 other things since – drunk out of the toilet, licked itself, barked at a neighbor – so it would make the connection of punishment with only the last thing it had done.

[Source Story: HumansLovingAnimals ]

SIMPLE act as share this story on Facebook or Twitter are really WORKS to help.
So we are closer to finding the LOVE for this precious pup rightfully deserves.
We have done it before and can certainly do it again. Thank you

One Comment

Leave a Reply
  1. People who do what zuzu’s owners did should go onto a do not adopt to list. They’re despicable. Hats off to the rescuers for taking her. And boots to the heads of her former owners.
    I wish all the garbage dog owners the worst in their miserable lives!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *